Another candidate withdraws for no reason?

Alan Charles, Labour candidate in Derbyshire has withdrawn from the election this morning believing himself to be disqualified because of a conditional discharge he received when he was 14.

Perhaps he should have read Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 s.14(1) which provides:-

(1) Subject to subsection (2) below, a conviction of an offence for which an order is made under section 12 above discharging the offender absolutely or conditionally shall be deemed not to be a conviction for any purpose other than the purposes of the proceedings in which the order is made and of any subsequent proceedings which may be taken against the offender under section 13 above.

(2)Where the offender was aged 18 or over at the time of his conviction of the offence in question and is subsequently sentenced (under section 13 above) for that offence, subsection (1) above shall cease to apply to the conviction.

(3)Without prejudice to subsections (1) and (2) above, the conviction of an offender who is discharged absolutely or conditionally under section 12 above shall in any event be disregarded for the purposes of any enactment or instrument which—

(a)imposes any disqualification or disability upon convicted persons; or

(b)authorises or requires the imposition of any such disqualification or disability


What will he do now? Is there anyone in the Labour party who understands the law?


P.S. I should credit Ros Baston, whose comments about conditional discharges a few weeks ago made me think of looking it up. Others obviously owe her credit too.

P.P.S. The referenced 's.12 above' doesn't necessarilly exclude discharges made before the 2000 Act became law – so someone still needs to check if discharges made before this were covered by similar get-out clauses!


This entry was posted in Perspectives and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Another candidate withdraws for no reason?

  1. Bill Brereton says:

    Surely a sensible person knows if the have been arrested and dealt with by the police/courts no matter how long ago?
    Presumably sensible people are seeking to by PCCs…..
    What are their Parties [where appropriate] and Agents or prospective Agents doing in terms of due diligence.
    The law is quite clear.
    One would hope that Prospective Police and Crime Commissioners would have at least a basic understanding of the law that relates to the role they are hoping for!!!

  2. odriscall says:

    The wheels are coming off – and to coin a ‘police’ phrase it has all gone pear shaped. Time to call this farce off before it causes irreparable damage to the criminal justice system.

  3. Sauce for the Goose says:

    I note that the minimum educational standard for Police Officers is now 3 A levels or the equivalent. Would all PCC candidates please make a declaration that they meet this minimum standard.

  4. Terry Renshaw says:

    In answer to your question “does anyone in the Labour Party understand the law” YES I do and as Bill Brereton points out above I also have an understanding of Policing

    • samchapman says:

      But how long will you be staying in the Labour party. The local papers in North Wales reported you weren’t renewing your membership after the farce of the Labour PCC selection process there.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s