Are trades unions buying influence with PCCs?

Regular and long-established readers will be glad to hear of the return to these pages of Lancashire Labour Candidate Clive Grunshaw, who I have previously christened 'the gift that keep on giving', and this turns out to be an ironic title, because today's article concerns some gifts that he has received.

Head over to the Electoral Commission's website and have a look at their Register of Regulated Donees, and you will find that in July (which is reported in August), with the Lancashire Labour selection safely out of the way, County Councillor Grunshaw registered two donations to his selection campaign from Unite the Union, each allegedly worth £2,500, for printing and posting of mailshots for his selection campaign.

One of these donations dated back to April, but by delaying the submission to July, Labour members cast their votes unaware that Unite's backing extended to spending £5,000 on the mailshots they got through the election campaign, and unaware that he had this funding advantage over his opponents.

You may remember that one of Cllr Grunshaw's mailshots landed him in trouble with the Labour party and led to him being forced to apologise to his Labour rivals for the post.

There are a few odd things about this though, just two of which we will explore now.

1) Doesn't Unite the Union represent Police Staff? Is it proper for a PCC candidate to accept such a significant benefit from a Union that represent staff in the organisation he seeks to lead? Will there not be questions over the impact of his every policy on police staff and union paymasters?

2) The really strange thing though is that Councillor Grunshaw's declarations are the only ones I could find from any candidate in these election related to their selection campaign. Search for your favourite candidate here. Any such donations to party members, including those in kind, and that includes the cumulative value of a number of smaller donations, to a total value of over £1,500, should already have been reported to the Commission.

Are there really no other candidates who have had such benefits? No other candidates receiving payments from a union? No other funded mailshots in Labour's all-postal ballot selections, where mailshots were the only way to get more than 200 words before the party members who have the votes?

Have Unions been trying to buy influence with Labour candidates?

Have Labour candidates failed to disclose this, keeping an inconvenient story from Labour members, and from the wider electorate?

Time will tell.

This entry was posted in Resources and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Are trades unions buying influence with PCCs?

  1. Do you take a similar view on Tory or other party donors who have a personal financial interest in any company that profits from contracts in which the PCC will have a say?

    How many Tory party donors for instance have shares in G4S and its competitors and will directly benefit from the great wave of further police service privatisation that is promised by your government?

    In fact given how the investment funds used by the high net worth individuals who fund the Tory party operate it is actually almost inconceivable that a wealthy donor will not have money invested in such companies.

    But as (unlike Unite) no Tory donors appear to have reported any £1,500+ donations at all to the Electoral Commission all of the millions of leaflets that are piling up in your campaign offices are presumably appearing and will be posted by magic.

    • samchapman says:

      People need to declare their interests. Lacking omniscience I cannot declare them for them, but I can tell you what I’ve found. I can’t make you happy to hear it.

  2. Pingback: Mitt Romney Style? |

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s