The other withdrawal

A fortnight ago Mervyn Barrett withdrew from the Lincolnshire PCC election in a blaze of publicity that continues to burn bright, and in the last week Lee Barron attempted to withdraw from the Northamptonshire race with a fair amount of attention that will follow him where ever he goes. There has been another withdrawal however, not greatly celebrated in the media, that of Charles Swabey in Derbyshire, who got all the way to being nominated, only to withdraw a few days later. For what reason? He didn't want to split 'the Independent vote'.

There's a curious concept. Independents are supposed to be, well, independent, yet apparently they can also stick together. In some places in local government whole swathes of Independents band together to form majorities in a Council, and some suggest they act exactly like political parties but under a different brand. But of course one cannot brand all Independents this way, because they are, er, independent.

If there is a tantalising aspect to the PCC election surely it is the question of whether voters who appear to disapprove of political parties involvement in policing will actually in the end of the day vote for Independents instead. Depending on how you count them there are around 55 people who have parted with £5,000 of someone's hard earned cash because they think they may see it again by getting over 5% of the vote, and may even win.

But will they?

In my view, even if there were a surge of support for Independents, most of them would not win for precisely the reason that Mr Swabey chose to withdraw. One Independent might attract some interest, but more than one would split that interest, and more than two in an election where people only get to vote twice would have been fatal to it.

Where there are two Independents people may think that it's OK, as they can use their supplementary vote to switch from one to the other, but that only happens where one of them gets into the top two in the first round. There are no bronze medals in the PCC elections.

So, while I remain to be convinced that the anti-politics feeling will really crystalise into votes for Independents who people do not actually know, here is my list of areas where I think Independents will struggle the hardest, because there are too many of them (number of Independents in parentheses):-

Cambridgeshire (2)

Devon and Cornwall (6)

Essex (2)

Gwent (2)

Hampshire (2ish) – Don Jerrard is standing under the 'Justice and Anti-Corruption' banner)

Humberside (3)

Kent (2)

Lincolnshire (2)

North Wales (2)

Northumbria (2)

South Wales (2)

Surrey (2ish) – Kevin Hurley describes himself as “Zero Tolerance Policing ex Chief”

Thames Valley (2)

West Midlands (3)

Wiltshire (2)

So in 34 of 41 areas there are Independents standing, but in 15 of them there are so many that they threaten the possibility of Independent success. That makes 19 areas where a powerful surge to the Independents could pay off, but 7 where there is no Independent option, and 15 that share 36 Independent candidates. If this is a shockingly good election for Independents there remain 22 areas where party candidates have an edge, i.e. most of the areas.

There is no allowance here for the force of their personality, the effectiveness of their networks, or the impact of their campaigns. For some this may not be electoral suicide, but it sure looks like the first evidence of lemmings in Devon and Cornwall, and the failure of so many Independents even on a good day could hit the numbers next time round.

This entry was posted in Independents, Perspectives. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The other withdrawal

  1. Ivan Jordan says:

    It’s hard to dispute the logic of your piece, and I am particularly amused by the lemmings metaphor, but I do expect a reaction against the Parties – it is what everyone I meet says. Something that does bother me is the paper candidates, and one inde

    • Ivan Jordan says:

      Whoa, that comment went up incomplete due to iPhone vs finger issues. As I was saying: one indie has not bothered to show up at any public meetings . He appears to be doing it as a public V sign to the police, an act of electoral vandalism, which is a shame. But I am quietly confident. Stranger things have happened, and I am confident that anyone who compares the candidates in any depth will find there is one stand out candidate.

  2. Ian Johnston says:

    Sam, Interesting article. I hope and I believe that you are wrong in the case of Gwent. I think it is a mistake to just “lump” two Independent Candidates together when their credibilty may be seen as miles apart in a small County where one Independent candidate is well known and has a distinquished police career. You also need to take in to account that the two Political candidates may be seen to have been parachuted in to the County for poltical expedience.

    Happy to take a small side bet.

    Hope you are well,


    • samchapman says:

      I’ll watch the result in Gwent with interest. Clearly the wider point is about voter behaviour and mathematics, but I’m saying what I see, not what I would like to see.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s