Gillian Radcliffe withdraws from South Yorkshire PCC election

Gillian Radcliffe was intending to stand as an Independent candidate for South Yorkshire Police and Crime Commissioner. She has allowed TopOfTheCops to carry her explanation as to why she has withdrawn from the contest that can be found on her website at


It is with enormous sadness that I must today announce that I am withdrawing as an Independent candidate in the election for Police & Crime Commissioner in South Yorkshire. I will not be seeking formal nomination in October.


After several weeks of preparing for the campaign, I have come to the realisation that I cannot afford to continue. The resources necessary go far beyond the £5000 deposit. I always expected to do things on a shoestring but, never having previously been involved in a public election, I was naïve about how much it would cost to raise awareness of my credentials for the role and my policies.


I now see that, in an area like South Yorkshire, where there are almost a million potential voters to reach, I would need a very extensive programme of activity and publicity. That comes at a price. The election rules set the campaign spending limits at £178,637 per candidate in South Yorkshire. Initially I laughed at the idea of such a limit, but now understand that this is not as fanciful as it sounds. An expert in political campaigns has told me that even “doing it on the cheap” would cost at least £50,000. I simply don’t have that sort of money, or anything like it.


I am not saying that party political candidates have it easy. I am aware that some have to fund their own deposits and most have to be actively involved in local fund-raising. The difference for me is that, as a recent returner to living in South Yorkshire as my main home, I don’t yet have the extensive contacts and networks of potential support that more established candidates have. I am not moaning about that: it’s simply a fact and one I’ve considered in making my decision.


If I could have, I would have returned to the area and begun my preparations much earlier. I’ve made several attempts to come back to South Yorkshire full-time in recent years, but the right job hasn’t been available for me. When the elections were announced, I had professional commitments in London that I wanted to honour and I didn’t think I could have a go. It was only when I became free of those commitments in early August that I reconsidered and decided to try, but it’s obvious now that it was already too late and I now must accept that.


Of course, I’m deeply dismayed that I can’t continue. My experience of policing, crime reduction, partnership across agencies, public engagement and senior management is a rare combination but fitting for the job that the PCC needs to do. I think I was arguably one of the candidates across England and Wales who was most suitably “trained” for the very demanding role of PCC.


If this were just about applying for a job, I would feel confident I met the essential criteria and I’d steam ahead. As it is, the office must be gained by election. This is something where I don’t have the same extensive package of experience or skill. After a professional life spent mainly in the public sector, almost always in politically-restricted posts, I haven’t had that opportunity.


I do not consider the past few weeks wasted. I have learned a lot and one of those things is that I really do want to be involved in public life and particularly in relation to policing and community safety. I will consider carefully what I do next but I may well decide to put myself up for election in one role or another in the future, when I have had time to settle in properly to South Yorkshire life.


The other great plus is that I now have my home in the Barnsley area, with wonderful neighbours, and the opportunity to make new friends as well as see a lot more of my many old friends in the area. I take that as an enormous benefit in terms of quality of life.


I must give an enormous thank you to the very many people who have offered to support my nomination, or who have donated money to my campaign or offered their time to do battle for me on the campaign trail. I will be in touch with you individually over the next few days but I just wanted to say how much I appreciate your support and to apologise if you feel I’m letting you down.


There are two party political candidates now left to contest the PCC role, along with anyone else who enters the fray over the next month or so. I wish them both the very best in their election efforts and hope that this campaign will be won on issues and integrity. For my part, I have a vote in South Yorkshire so I will be following the action closely and pitching in now and then with my views as I make my own assessment on the merits of the candidates.


My message to the voters of South Yorkshire is to ask them to go out and vote for this crucially important role and to urge them to set purely political allegiances to one side as you decide how best to use your vote. Please consider which person has the right skills and experience to do this job for you and who is most likely to take their lead from local people and not from their party HQ in London. It is too important to base your decision solely on the colour of a rosette.


This entry was posted in Candidate Statements, Independents and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Gillian Radcliffe withdraws from South Yorkshire PCC election

  1. laura5759 says:

    PooR. GilliAn Couldn’t. Cope.
    Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone on O2

  2. Kiron Reid says:

    Gillian Radcliffe looks like exactly the kind of candidate that the Government said that they wanted for these posts but are not getting because of the system that they have set up. I note Gillian highlights the problem and potential huge cost of getting any promotion to the public if you are not backed by a party machine, as well as money required for a deposit.

  3. Kiron Reid says:

    Even at this stage the £5000 deposit should be challenged.
    It is far more in real terms than a Westminster election.
    It is proportionately far more than for a European election.
    In real terms in Liverpool it half the annual salary of many working people in North Liverpool and inner city areas.
    It is 1/5 of the average gross salary
    It is nearly 1/4 of the average annual income for full-time female employees (Daily Telegraph 23/11/2011 citing ONS).
    It does not appear to reflect any genuine cost of printing names on a ballot paper.
    The deposit amount seems both unreasonable (as excessive) and to interfere with freedom of expression as a person cannot put themselves forward for the election for the post unless they are willing to risk £5,000. An expensive hobby as an experienced barrister commented to me.
    The Home Office Police and Crime Commissioner pages do not explain the rational for such a high deposit.

  4. Sceptical of PCC's says:

    How’s this for Democratic deficit?
    Blair Gibbs, policy wonk from the right wing think tank Policy Exchange, the very same think thank that birthed the concept of PCC’s is to take a position, an unelected position, as Policy Advisor to the London Mayor!
    Blair has previous experience only as a Policy wonk, has no Policing experience or qualification (not even Law).
    I believe this is the definition of hypocrisy

    • samchapman says:

      To be fair, his profession is policy, and he is to be a policy advisor. And to add balance, in my view PCCs were properly birthed, or at least conceived in a paper by Douglas Carswell for the Cchange think tank in 2002 I think.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s