Early results show few, but thoughtful, voters

I’ve been doing media interviews this morning, so thought I should start my own results coverage online by summing up what I think we are learning about the election. I should mention that Bernard Rix has been running his own excellent unofficial results coverage in the morning if you need instant access to the figures.

Firstly the turnout is disappointingly low, generally hovering in the mid-teens. Many voters have told me they have had nothing from candidates and were not going to vote. On the one hand this is a little encouragement to those of us who push out such material, often wondering whether it is read and makes a difference, but on the other it raises the question over whether central provision of a candidates booklet would have been a help. My own suspicion is that the greater factor is that when people are asked to make a decision they need to have a choice, and it has not always been evident what difference supporting a particular candidate would make, with a number choosing safe generic promises to tackle crime and Anti-Social Behaviour over anything that contained insight.

However, as Michael Crick has said, people are making too much of turnout. Next time the PCC elections will be together with the local elections, and the plan is that they coincide with the 2020 general election after that. For turnout the only way is up, and no-one who accepted the legitimacy of unelected police authorities can criticise PCCs for lacking a mandate.

Secondly, we have a number of real upsets from Independents Martyn Underhill in Dorset, Ian Johnston in Gwent, Winston Roddick in North Wales – the last two confounding my expectations that a split in the Independent vote would prove terminal. That points to the voters who did turn out making a discerning choice. These perhaps are the people who did peruse the papers, google the candidates, visit this and other sites, and made a conscious and informed decision as to who was best. When I forecast opinion poll results to get a baseline for these elections I despaired at tribal splits and asked readers to make me wrong, and you have done me proud!

Thirdly, there is an element of defiance of parties who take the voters for granted. Christopher Salmon’s surprise win in Dyfed-Powys for the Conservatives was their best chance, but it means both that he has done very well, and that Christine Gwyther has done very badly. Labour will be shocked, having lost at least three of four opportunities in Wales.

But that third element has a specific point of detail. I have gone on at length on this site and elsewhere about how the parties needed to listen to what three different pieces of research were telling them about what type of candidate was preferred. All the research showed a clear and distinct preference for police experience over political time-serving in this role. Parties ignore such a clear message at their peril and the election of a growing number of former officers in the first few results backs this up. Perhaps parties would have done better if they had given the public the candidates they wanted?

The final of my first thoughts is this – a YouGov poll at the weekend showed 28% of the population as certain to vote, with plenty more just behind them. That obviously did not happen. I’m not saying that there was anything wrong with YouGov’s maths, but there is a hidden assumption with polling – namely that what people say they will do, think they will do, and actually do, are clearly not always the same thing.

This entry was posted in Perspectives. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Early results show few, but thoughtful, voters

  1. Bill Chapman says:

    The abolition of these posts is long overdue. They are unnecessary and unwanted. We didn’t want any kind of person to fill these posts. The police authorities with their magistrates and elected members are far more representative of the public they serve.

  2. FYI and FWIW I have analysed the Sussex results as compared to the general election


    Absurdly low turnout, total collapse of Lib Dem and partial collapse of Tory vote, very strong UKIP and decent Labour showing.

    Had the Independent Ian Chisnall done slightly better and made the second round rather than Labour’s Godfrey Daniel he might well have won.

    Having said this its almost exactly the result I predicted – Tory forced into second round run-off against Labour – back in June when I first crunched the GE numbers,

  3. Mary Foster says:

    “All the research showed a clear and distinct preference for police experience over political time-serving in this role”.
    The people I talked to in my end of Somerset wished to vote for a qualified candidate, not along party lines. Party flacks need to be aware of that. Thanks for posting all the information on local candidates on this site. I was able to direct one WI group and a gardening club in the next village to check it out.

    • Well in Sussex by far the least qualified candidate won – although it could be argued that her loss of a third of the Tory GE vote in an election which her party should have had sewn up due to the very large percentage of postal votes and higher turnout in the Bluer districts and wards than the redder ones does somewhat support your point.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s